| Subject: | [OM] Re: lipstick on a pig? |
|---|---|
| From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:07:40 -0400 |
Twas true with film. No so true anymore as it used to be. Chuck Norcutt Tim Randles wrote: > Always remember, you get what you pay for.. you can take a picture > with a shoebox, as long as you have a good lens.. the lens is the > business end of things, not the camera body.. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Incident vs reflected, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Samyang/Phoenix (was Re: OM mount), Tim Randles |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: lipstick on a pig?, Tim Randles |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: lipstick on a pig?, Tim Randles |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |