Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Choices, choices [was E-330 gets Editors' Choice from PC Mag!]

Subject: [OM] Re: Choices, choices [was E-330 gets Editors' Choice from PC Mag!]
From: hiwayman@xxxxxxx (Walt Wayman)
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:35:47 +0000
I got that far, too.  I read all of all your posts, Moose.  Never know when 
I'll learn something.  :-]

Indeed, I noticed, in an off-handed way, that the E-330 viewfinder was smaller 
than the E-1's, but it bothered me so little that, although I have made a 
mental note more than once to do so, I keep forgetting to do a side-by-side 
comparison.  I guess I could go do that now, but then I'd have to write some 
sort of meaningful description of the difference, and I don't think it would be 
worth the effort.  Somehow, I seem to be suffering again today from a 
sporadically recurrent exacerbation of the dimunition in my predilection for 
pontification.

My opinion: it ain't no big deal.

Walt

--
"Anything more than 500 yards from 
the car just isn't photogenic." -- 
Edward Weston

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Yes I got that far! I didn't find it a problem or even an irritation  
> but perhaps I was enjoying the LCD too much and didn't rely or depend  
> on it.
> AndrewF
> 
> 
> On 25/03/2006, at 4:55 PM, Moose wrote:
> 
> > By the way, Walt and Andrew, if you get this far, reviewers are saying
> > how small and dim the E-330 finder is. Is it significantly worse than
> > the E-1 and E-500, or is this just a reaction to the big LCD?
> 
==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz