Looks like a 200mm/F4 to me.
Darin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:12 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: Someone doesn't know what they're selling 7598013314
> Looks like the 65-200/4 to me. I dug mine out to compare, but with a
> picture that small, it's hard to tell. But if I were a betting man ...
>
> Walt
>
> --
> "Anything more than 500 yards from
> the car just isn't photogenic." --
> Edward Weston
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "Jez Cunningham" <jez.cunningham@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Nope - the front part of the barrel (with the OK/passed sticker) is
>> only exposed for about a half-inch on the 35-105)
>> br
>> jez
>>
>> On 3/9/06, NSURIT@xxxxxxx <NSURIT@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > In a message dated 3/9/2006 9:24:25 AM Central Standard Time,
>> > jez.cunningham@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>> >
>> > I can't tell what the lens really is...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Looks like it could be the 35-105mm Zuiko. BB
>> >
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.0/276 - Release Date: 3/7/2006
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|