Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: E-1 ISO 800 Acceptability

Subject: [OM] Re: E-1 ISO 800 Acceptability
From: "Matthew Bristol" <bristolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 08:19:24 -0600
Maybe this question is basic...

How are ISO's simulated on a digital sensor?  Does the ISO setting
change the threshold signal for the sensor?

-Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Chuck Norcutt
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:10 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: E-1 ISO 800 Acceptability

Ah!  Just as I suspected.  Your 1/8 sec. shutter speed on this shot is 
substantially longer than CH's 1/320s shot.  Another thing that I think 
can contribute to noise is having the camera turned on for a long time 
and the sensor be warm.

The comparison Canon shot is not only shot at 1600 vs 800 but it also 
has a shutter speed 4 times as long at 1/2 sec.

Chuck Norcutt


Wayne S wrote:

  >
>>In your example, I would wonder a little about movement and blur as
>>contributing some negative effect.  And perhaps I am just insulating
>>myself from the devasting Heartbreak of Noise, but viewing at 100% is
>>not natural to me.  At 100% ISO 800 will definitely suffer in
>>comparison.
> 
> 
>>http://www.zuik.net/E1/800iso_A147882.jpg
> 
> I'm sure there was some movement - shot with 14-54 at 54, iso
> 800, 1/8 speed, f/4, spot metered, and using manual focus,
> handheld. It was this experience, one week before my daughter's
> wedding, that caused me to pull the plug on the E-1. I just couldn't
> live with the uncertainty in the performance of the camera. This is
> on the more extreme end of shooting, but an important one if shooting
> events.

<snip>

> 
> I'm sure there are many that would beg to differ and I love Olympus
> cameras as much as anybody. But I needed results I could depend
> on. So, one week later, at my daughters wedding,... here is a similar
> exposure with the 5D (again 100% crop):
> 
> http://www.zuik.net/E1/1600iso_MG_0276.jpg
> 5D, Iso 1600, F/4, 1/2 sec at 38mm focal length with 28-135 IS lens.
> 
> This is 1 stop faster iso and the image is perfectly usable. The
> E-1 would have to be iso 400 or lower to match the performance.
> You combine that with IS and that is a lot of difference for this type
> of shooting. The 5mp versus 12mp is not that big a deal to me
> compared to noise performance.
> 
>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that 
is confidential, subject to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
copying or distribution of this message or files associated with the message 
are strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, kindly 
notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your 
computer
==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz