What "distortion"? Looks fine to me!
ScottGee1
(Who is accessing his email from a pub . . .) ;o)
On 2/1/06, GeeBee <geebee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Nice shot Piers but I like distortion :-)
>
> http://www.geebeephoto.com/html/b07.html
>
> http://www.geebeephoto.com/html/b13.html
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 01 February 2006 15:34
> Subject: [OM] Re: #017 - #018 - #019
>
>
> >
> > Keeping us guessing, AG, or is it a trade secret?
> >
> > My preference is definitely for #019, just the kind of image I would go
> for
> > myself, and just the kind of image for my 24/3.5 to accentuate even more
> the
> > flow of the bridge, and de-emphasise even further the sky. A bit like
> > cropping off the top and right side, but filling the frame with what is
> > left. Something like this (no artistic merit claimed, just an
> illustration
> > of how you gett all foreground, little sky, but no distorted perspective)
> >
> > www.hemy.me.uk/Miscellany/bridge.jpg
> >
> > --
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|