Yes, you are right, also including my wife too :-)
Resolution of ZD 8mm is very good at the center but just so so at the edges,
there are some chroma at the edges too. Don't know how it compared to the
N*kon digital fisheye but as far as I remember, for film, the OM 16/3.5 was
better than the N*kon wide open.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> C.H. Ling wrote;
>>
>> It is absolutely not the quality of ZD8mm, either flash or PS was used on
>> their shot. Here are some photos I took with E-1 and ZD 8mm. Processed
>> with PS
>> CS2 no vignetting correction done.
>>
>> F5
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/P1201881s.jpg
>
> Unless I am very much mistaken, we have just had the first published self-
> portrait of Mr Ling !! =|:-)>
>
> Nice to see the face that goes with the voice, after all this time. You
> might
> as well submit it to TOPE, now !! :-)
>
> Good thing the mirror was so very clean and non-distorting.
>
> Brian
> PS. Oh, and the lens seems to have done a fine job at f/5 !!
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
