Ian
I have one and it works very well. I suppose you might be able to
spot the difference between this and the DZ50-200, but you would
probably have to work at it in most, benign, situations. The AF is
not as quick as with my 14-54, but that could be because of the
aperture rather than the speed of the gizmo inside. It is nice and
light and you are likely to carry it at all times where the DZ might
be a little heavier and more of a burden.
John Foster, of the Olympus Circle, was impressed with it ...
Chris
~~ >-)-
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
www.threeshoes.co.uk
homepage.mac.com/zuiko
On 24 Jan 2006, at 16:46, Ian Nichols wrote:
> Is there something seriously wrong with these? I know they're quite
> inexpensive, but there have been a couple on Ebay (UK) recently,
> with little
> or no use, the owner claiming to now have the Oly 50-200. Can they
> have
> been so terribly disgusted with the results that they went out and
> spent
> about four times the asking price on the Oly? Speaking as an
> impecunious
> user, I have some interest in these potential bargains.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|