Ack! Never sell the 21/3.5 for a 24/2.8. The 21/3.5 is THE lens
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:28 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: WTB Zuiko 24/2.8
>
> Bernard
>
> You're right! I might try and keep the 21/3.5 ... ;-)
>
> I am meandering back towards film. I might not even take a digital
> camera with me on my next holiday if it is by airline. If I drive
> (save the world etc ... by keeping the family emissions down ;-)) I
> could take the whole lot.
>
> Chris
> ~~ >-)-
> C M I Barker
> Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
> +44 (0)7092 251126
> www.threeshoes.co.uk
> homepage.mac.com/zuiko
>
>
> On 21 Jan 2006, at 18:32, Bernard Frangoulis wrote:
>
>>> I am planning to sell my 21/3.5 and buy a 24/2.8. Out of the team of
>>> enablers on the List, does anyone have a decent, MC copy of the
>>> latter handy for a reasonable price?
>>>
>>
>> Chris, what's wrong with the 21/3.5? Might make a nice "street
>> photography" 42mm lens with the E-1. Well, actually, I have both
>> the 21/3.5 and the 24/2.8 (I'm not selling, sorry), and am
>> contemplating taking either one for this usage in my next trip:
>> hesitating between the 21/3.5 (wider, but less luminous) and the
>> 24/2.8 (the opposite!). Lens set on hyperfocal at f/5.6 or f/8,
>> this might be worth trying.
>>
>> Bernard
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/235 - Release Date: 1/19/2006
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|