| Subject: | [OM] Re: DIGITAL ZUIKO 50/2, is good for portrait? |
|---|---|
| From: | AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:50:27 -0700 (PDT) |
> There's a background? Guess I need to look again. Couldn't
> get past the gorgeous foreground.
That's what we call a three-dimensional photograph.
AG
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: DIGITAL ZUIKO 50/2, is good for portrait?, Walt Wayman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: DIGITAL ZUIKO 50/2, is good for portrait?, Bill Pearce |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: DIGITAL ZUIKO 50/2, is good for portrait?, Walt Wayman |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: DIGITAL ZUIKO 50/2, is good for portrait?, Bill Pearce |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |