Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: E-500 specs (long) OT

Subject: [OM] Re: E-500 specs (long) OT
From: "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:12:13 +1200
James King wrote
> >
> > * On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:12:07AM -0400, Chuck Norcutt said:
> >> I thought it was pretty rEVOLTing myself because that's the word that is
> >> invoked in my mind when I see EVOLT.  Yuck!
> >
> > I've noticed other manufacturers using names in addition to numbers in the 
> > US
> > market.  Why they can't just use the model number I'll never know.  And yes,
> > Evolt is ugly.  But then not a lot more than C*n*n's Digital Rebel. Hum...
> > silliness.
> 
> As intel said you can't protect a number e.g. 486 and stop someone else
> using it but you can protect a name like pentium....
> James

I'm not so sure Intel / James are correct about protecting a number.  There 
was a huge scrap between Porsche and Peugeot over their numbers; I forget 
the exact numbers, but it was in the era when the Porsche 911 and the 
Peugeot 404 were alive and well.

Brian

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz