chling wrote:
>I sold the small aperture zuiko wides (21/3.5, 24/2.8 and long ago the
>28/2.8), keeping the 21/2, 24/2, 28/2 and 35/2 but now it seems that the
>smaller aperture one work better in digital.
>
Mike H. tested 21/2 lens(es) too. He didn't post samples, but said the
performance on 1DsII was essentially the same at the same apertures.
>Anyway, my wish for a FF digital is just for backing up the OM lenses, I don't
>really care much about the performance, I'm sure they will be more than enough
>for my applications.
>
>It is the feel of manual focusing and be able to see the big and beautiful
>image in the viewfinder that I love. I really don't like big zoom (especially
>wide zoom) and AF but it is no fun to focus with the E-1's small viewfinder.
>
Specs and Can*n history assure that the viewfinder won't be up to an OM,
but still way better for MF than the ones on any of the small sensor bodies.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|