Good god almighty! Those are sick!
JHW
On Aug 4, 2005, at 6:25 PM, Earl Dunbar wrote:
>
> Obviously Canon digic in the mix. Yuck.
>
> Jez Cunningham wrote:
>
>
>> So you don't aspire to pictures like these?:
>>
>> http://www.beckycarter.com/color.html
>>
>> Pass the bucket...
>> Jez
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Manuel Viet" <oly@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [OM] Re: Confession time...
>> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:54:23 +0200
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Le lundi 01 Août 2005 22:43, Jonas Otter a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is it really C*n*n's sensors that are so much better? My
>>>> impression of
>>>> what comes out of a C*n*n digital is that the camera has applied
>>>> vast
>>>> amounts of processing to get that vinyl-yet-unlikely-razor-sharp
>>>> quality in the pictures. People look like Barbie dolls in them
>>>> to me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> *pfffffuuuuuhhh* (vast sigh of relief here) ; so, I'm not the
>>> *only* person in
>>> the whole world to see it ? I was on the verge of thinking that I
>>> was Joan of
>>> Arc reincarnated when I was trying to show it to my friends and
>>> relatives. It
>>> appears that consumers actually seem to prefer that plastic look
>>> because it
>>> removes marks on the skin. Sony p&s are very badly affected as
>>> well, despite
>>> their Leitz T* lenses.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Manuel Viet
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature
-- File: smime.p7s
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|