| Subject: | [OM] Re: question-portrait lens |
|---|---|
| From: | hiwayman@xxxxxxx (Walt Wayman) |
| Date: | Fri, 03 Jun 2005 16:13:27 +0000 |
Get a 65-200/4 Zuiko. It covers all the recommended focal lengths, and since it's more likely than not to have a hazy element in the rear, it'll give you, at no extra cost, a bit of that special "portrait lens" diffusion. Personally, I prefer the 100/2 or the 180/2.8. Walt -- "Anything more than 500 yards from the car just isn't photogenic." -- Edward Weston ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2, Jeff Keller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2, Hans van Veluwen |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: question-portrait lens, Chuck Norcutt |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: question-portrait lens, Timpe, Jim |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |