I totally agree with Simon. And as for "so perhaps this would be a
good time to send both in to John... or should I? Given that another
OM1n body can be had for about the same price as a full CLA?"
well, another OM1n body might also need a CLA. And IMO, saving as many
OMs as possible is always the first choice. I've heard they're no
longer being made.
Earl
Simon Worby wrote:
>iddi wrote:
>
>
>
>>Assuming it got sprayed but not soaked through, what are the
>>odds any of it made it inside the top cover, or dare I say,
>>into the lens (my fav lens!)? The second OM1n I have needs a
>>CLA as the meter needs to be set to 1.55, so perhaps this
>>would be a good time to send both in to John... or should I?
>>Given that another OM1n body can be had for about the same
>>price as a full CLA?
>>
>>
>
>If it were me, I'd get it off to be sorted out before any internal
>damage occurs. Salt is horrible for most metals; I can't help feeling
>you'll be worried sick about what's going on inside unless you get it
>addressed now.
>
>A stitch in time could save nine...
>
>Regards,
>
>Simon
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|