Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Speaking of the 35-80/2.8 Zuiko....

Subject: [OM] Re: Speaking of the 35-80/2.8 Zuiko....
From: hiwayman@xxxxxxx (Walt Wayman)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 18:46:02 +0000
Joel,

Keep us informed.  Sounds promising and provides yet another reason for me to 
hold onto mine pending the day I go over to the dark side.  Besides, 70-160 
covers three of my favorite prime focal lengths: 80, 100, 135, and gets close 
enough to a fourth, 180, for guvmint work.

Walt

--
"Anything more than 500 yards from 
the car just isn't photogenic." -- 
Edward Weston

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Quoting Walt Wayman <hiwayman@xxxxxxx>:
> 
> > Mentioning what I wouldn't sell mine for got me to
> > thinking.  I don't read the digital stuff all that
> > thoroughly, so I may have missed a tidbit or two here and
> > there, but I don't recall any of you pixelheads talking
> > about using the analog Zuiko zooms on either an E-Thing
> > or even an off-brand DSLR, like a C-Thing.  I would've
> > thought the 35-80/2.8 Zuiko would be a natural,
> > considering its reputation for quality.
> > 
> > Exactly why is that?  Don't any of y'all have one?  If
> > someone would like to donate an E-Thing for a few months,
> > I could check it out.  :-)
> > 
> > Walt 
> 
> I suppose I haven't done more with it because it becomes 
> the equivalent of a 75-150 (not literally, but you know 
> the lens I'm thinking of), which was never one of my 
> favoriate lenses, and it's very heavy for the mount in 
> cases of tripod shots, when the 14-54 covers a lot of the 
> range very well and is much lighter.  I think the E-1 
> mount is fully up to the weight.  I don't know about the 
> Canyons but might be concerned about the mount on the d-
> rebels.
> 
> It is on the to-do list however.  I did a little 
> comparison of the 35-80 at the long end at the same time I 
> was trying out the 90/2.  I just enjoyed using the 90/2 so 
> much that I didn't really get back to the 35-80/2.8.
> 
> The one thing I recall specifically is that color balance 
> was very good, requiring no special fooling around to 
> trick the camera's WB settings -- a Good Thing IMO.
> 
> Joel W.
> 
>
==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz