Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Digital cameras - OT?

Subject: [OM] Re: Digital cameras - OT?
From: "Radix" <rascalia@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 14:33:16 +0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt"

> As a sometimes wedding and event photographer I would recommend the
> Canon 20D as the best picture taking machine available in the $1500
> range.  It has high resolution (8 MP), very low noise (ISO 1600 and even
> 3200 are quite usable) and exceptional low light autofocus ability.  For
> an OM user it can also be adapted to OM lenses.  However, any of the
> Nikons will probably better it in accuracy of TTL metering (not a Canon
> strongpoint) and the Minolta 7D will beat both of them in ergonomics.
> Despite many happy E-1 users on the Olympus list I can't recommend it
> for wedding and event photography because I consider it non-competitive
> in noise and low light autofocus.  It's technologically dated at this
> point and hopefully the "E-2" will be better.


Sean Reid, a contributor for luminous landscape recently did a survey on E-1
pro user and wrote a review here:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/e1-2nd.shtml

surprisingly the largest percentage of E-1 pro user is wedding photographer,
and they quite happy with it.
Sorry if this been posted before

cheers
Radix


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [OM] Re: Digital cameras - OT?, Radix <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz