Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: 21mm F2 and 24mm f2 - worth the extra over the slower 21 and 24

Subject: [OM] Re: 21mm F2 and 24mm f2 - worth the extra over the slower 21 and 24 zuikos?
From: Thomas Clausen <T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:48:52 +0100

On 24 Mar 2005, at 19:21, AG Schnozz wrote:

> I'm on my second 24/2.8. Plumb wore out the first. In the wide
> angles (wider than 28mm) I really don't care what version it is
> (F2, F2.8, F3.5, 21mm, 24mm) as long as it's multicoated.
>
> The only time I've lusted after a wider lens than the 24mm is
> when shooting interiors.
>
> I've actually preferred the slower versions of most of the
> lenses because of the 49mm filter and their lightweightness.
> When backpacking, I can carry almost my entire kit with me.
>

Well, knowing you that'd be an 100/2.8 and a 24/2.8 and a body....now I 
am confused, you say "almost your entire kit" -- which of these three 
items do you leave at home, ken? :)

--thomas


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz