| Subject: | [OM] Re: incident light meter, was: OM-1 to OM-4T - worth an upgrade? |
|---|---|
| From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:16:00 -0800 |
Documenting the photographic results is key. A photograph with a small exposure error is better than a perfectly exposed picture after the moment is past. Winsor Long Beach, California, USA On Feb 22, 2005, at 9:43 AM, James N. McBride wrote: > nd documenting the > photographic results is one way to get that experience. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [Photo] fun with the Olympus D560, Walt Wayman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Any flash on XA -- useful adapter seen the first time, Chris Barker |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: incident light meter, was: OM-1 to OM-4T - worth an upgrade?, James N. McBride |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Any flash on XA -- useful adapter seen the first time, Andreas Pirner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |