My apologies Bill. I read your first response too fast and
misunderstood what you wrote. I thought you were describing one
method... using corners to hold the print in place and hinging the
cover mat to the back mat which is a method I used in the past for a
portfolio. I wasn't aware of the method of hinge mounting the print (I
just now dug up an explanation for it on the web). You never had
problems with a print warping under glass using this method? Hmmm, I
might give it a try, even though I don't feel my prints qualify as
"fine art". :)
Richard
--- NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 1/5/2005 12:29:33 PM Central Standard Time,
> sylv4700@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> I've used this method in the past for
> some things though I was looking for a more permanent mount that
> would
> be used in framing and would prevent any waves in the print.
>
>
>
>
> I've never had problems with waves with a hinge mount, which I think
> is
> probably the mount of choice for most "fine art" prints. It also
> minimizes
> potential damage to the print. This may get some disagreement from
> the list, but
> what the heck at least it isn't SUVs, guns, religion or politics.
> Bill Barber
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|