| Subject: | [OM] Re: lens questions |
|---|---|
| From: | Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:05:05 -0700 |
I think the 28/3.5 is a fine performer, maybe not razor sharp as the 28/2 is said to be but plenty good enough. Add the fact that it is small and light and dirt cheap and you have a perfect travel lens in a great focal length. (Now if that pitch gets you worked up I just happen to have an extra one for sale :>) Mike ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Minolta scanner, Terry and Tracey |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: What's missing?, Mike |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 50 f1.4, Simon Worby |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: What's missing?, Mike |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |