Could the person in the red shirt be a "blokess"? IE the mother of ( hopefully
)
the children being photographed by their father?
I wouldn't blame him for being distracted by the interesting ( outstanding? )
background.
David
Wayne Harridge wrote:
> "Photographer with background problem" is interesting, what is the bloke
> in the red shirt looking at ?
>
> ...Wayne
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
>>[mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walt Wayman
>>Sent: Friday, 17 September 2004 9:00 PM
>>To: Oly List
>>Subject: [OM] Free Pictures! Free Pictures!
>>
>>
>>Hurricane Ivan came ashore yesterday a little west of the
>>Destin/Ft. Walton Beach, Florida area where we had been until
>>we were told to evacuate this past Tuesday. The storm
>>rearranged things rather haphazardly, including washing out
>>sections of the coast highway and collapsing a bridge on
>>Interstate 10. As promised (threatened), I'm posting a few
>>shots I took while we were there. You will see no wall
>>hangers here, just some quick and dirty scans.
>>
>>This was never intended to be a serious photographic outing,
>>so I hauled along only two OM-4T's, with motor drives, and
>>seven lenses. The lenses included my "serious" walk about
>>kit of 19-35/3.5~4.5 Phoenix, 35-80/2.8 Zuiko, and 80-200/2.8
>>Tamron. But because I didn't want the bother of a camera
>>bag, or even a fanny pack, and because it was just too damn
>>hot even for my lightweight and ventilated Cabela's safari
>>vest of many pockets, the only lens that made it out of the
>>condo was the 28-105/2.8 Tamron.
>>
>>I know some of you don't think much of this lens and have not
>>been bashful about saying so, and I certainly won't argue
>>that it's optically equal to the 35-80/2.8 Zuiko, or even the
>>35-105/2.8 Tamron. But its range make it my favorite
>>one-lens outfit, which, to me, outweighs it's large size and
>>possibly infinitesimally lesser optical performance. The
>>only other lenses that even made it out of the bag on this
>>trip were the 80-200/2.8 Tamron and 500/8 Zuiko, which I used
>>for a couple of shots from the balcony. In fact, in four
>>days, I took only 72 photographs. I guess I'm slowing down
>>in my dotage.
>>
>>Here's the link:
>>
>
> http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/html/view.cgi-photos.html-.html
>
> Walt
>
> --
> "Anything more than 500 yards from
> the car just isn't photogenic." --
> Edward Weston
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|