| Subject: | [OM] Re: Hunstanton Norfolk #9 (4 shots) |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Gullen <andrew.gullen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 09 Jul 2004 23:18:45 -0400 |
on 2004/07/09 11:01 AM, Graham Battison at geebeephoto@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > http://www.geebeephoto.com/temp/Olympus/Hunstanton_09.htm Very nice. First and last are my favorites - they look like Tai Chi. :-) Andrew ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Reds & digital/Re: Re: E1 vs. 10D, D100, D70, etc..., Andrew Gullen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: FL-50, was E1 vs. 10D, D100, D70, etc..., Andrew Gullen |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Hunstanton Norfolk #9 (4 shots), Graham Battison |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Hunstanton Norfolk #9 (4 shots), Chris Barker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |