Y'know, I hadn't noticed the paint problem. I was too distracted by all the
samll print, with virtually nothing by way of description of the camera.
And by the "US only". And by the seller being apparently an agency to
enable anybody to sell on the auction. Just anybody? Come on, that is a
bit lax, surely there are standards to meet?
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Gordon J. Ross
Sent: 25 March 2004 10:58
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Cheap OM-3?
Hi Piers:
Seems low, but the as is would contribute, plus looks prwtty 'weathered',
and there is a resale lesson in not painting out the name and model
insignias. My suspicion about 3's is that most get looked at in a
collection. not used in the field.
Gord
----- Original Message -----
From: "Piers Hemy"
> #3804280974 sold for $205.50. A couple of well-known names were
> bidding (but did not win). It seems to have gone for a low price,
> what do you think?
>
> Piers
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe:
mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
<mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=> List Problem"
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|