I would really like an E-1 I'm sure. My fear was that the lack of IS capability
would relegate the E system to the same path as the OM system without
auto focus. To do the anti-shake thing, does the camera need to be able
to move the sensor, do it digitally (multiple readout), or add an optical
control path? And which approaches are not possible if Olympus chooses to
not pay patent licensing fees? Ideally they would to it in the body if possible
so
we would not need to purchase new lenses. At the moment, I just don't see any
path to IS for the E system. Moving the sensor to compensate seems the logical
solution.
Wayne
Let's see, what can I sell. perhaps my 3ti for $2000 .... how much for the
E-1...
Skip wrote:
>I thought that the small finder would be an issue, but the screens snap very
>easily into focus in MF mode. And it's very easy to see the entire, 100%
>finder with glasses on, something you can't do with many other cameras. After
>a week, the finder hasn't been an issue. I don't use MF very much anyway,
>preferring to use the AF+MF mode where you can hold the shutter down and
>fine-tune the focus, then completeing the exposure. But switching from
>Continuous AF to Single AF to MF is VERY, VERY easy with an easily manipulated
>switch.
>
>The lack of IS is still an issue, but my guess is that there will be another
>body with in-camera IS next year.
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|