It offers the viewer a choice of emotions perhaps? The subject could
be happy, sad or terrified - yet the blurring stops us from seeing
exactly what is going on or where it might be.
Chris
On 13 Mar 2004, at 15:07, Daniel Tan wrote:
>
> Alright, I'm not really copying him; more following his lead.
>
> I've been staring at this photo for hours now. I still have no idea why
> I like it. When I shot it I thought I had completely buggered the photo
> up.
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?
> photo_id=2202996&photo_sel_index=0#ph
> oto
>
> Yes, it's badly panned. Yes, it's slightly out of focus. Yes, it's not
> technically a good shot. And yes, that is a speck of dust on the right
> hand side (didn't get around to cleaning the neg/scan). Thoughts?
> Suggestions?
>
> Daniel Tan
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|