Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: [OT] Stock agency resolution requirement, was: OM to E1 adapto

Subject: [OM] Re: [OT] Stock agency resolution requirement, was: OM to E1 adaptor
From: "Jim Caldwell" <jamesfc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:15:11 -0500
This is a stock agency - Alamy.

Jim Caldwell

********************************
Stock Photography
www.specialty-media.com
********************************

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Earl Dunbar
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 8:33 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: [OT] Stock agency resolution requirement, was: OM to E1
adaptor


OK, I`m missing something here.  Is this a PHOTO agency or a geek shop?

Earl

jamesfc@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Actually, it's more sinister than that!  They want the final image
> interpolated up to a minimum of 48MB and 'suggest' that the minimum raw
> TIFF file from digital cameras should be no less than 17 MB.  
> 
> As I indicated, I've used Geniune Fractals to upsize some of my E-10
images
> to 48 MB and they have accepted them.  However, if I'm going to shell out
> the money for a new system, I need to know that the agencies I use will
> accept those images!
> 
> I've also been unable to find a camera shop locally that carries the E-1
> and so I've been unable to actually hold one and try it out.  I believe
> someone else on the list here mentioned that he had gone all over the
Tampa
> Bay area without being able to locate one.
> 
> BTW - I've been very pleased with my E-10 and it has more than paid for
> itself in the 16 months or so that I've owned it.
> 
> Jim Caldwell
> 
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Chuck Norcutt chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:37:49 -0500
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: [OT] Stock agency resolution requirement, was:  OM to E1
> adaptor
> 
> 
> Seems a strange way to specify it.  If they want a to end up with an 
> uncompressed 24-bit TIFF file of 17MB then they want a sensor resolution 
> of 17/3 = 5.67 megapixels.  Don't know why they don't just say that.  I 
> should think 5 megapixels from a 3:4 aspect ratio sensor is close enough.
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> jamesfc@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://mail2web.com/ .
> 
> 
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> 
> To contact the list admins:
mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"

The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz