On Feb 25, 2004, at 9:11 PM, Stephen Scharf wrote:
> It's a very, very nice camera capable of producing beautiful
> photographs. I woudn't hesitate to recommend one for your needs. Some
> of the prints I've seen from it are spectacular.
>
> -Stephen.
Something that always confused me about the E-20 was the way there were
different megapixel counts for interlaced and progressive scan. I don't
quite understand the concept of progressive scan and interlaced video
in the case of still photography, I guess. I mean, why interlace when
there are no alternating fields to lace together? Anyone who can shed
light on that facet of the E-20 (or any camera) would be high on my
list this week. ;-)
-Rob
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|