Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 review

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 review
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 19:33:16 -0400
You have some really strange definition of "light year!" I'd hardly call
6.3 mgp v 5 mgp a "light year.";-)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Danrich
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 6:09 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 review


Yea ha ha a trap!
When it comes to digital, Canon is light years ahead for now. XDan

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 12:02 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 review

Don't answer!  
Leia: "Luke, It's a trap!"



From: "Danrich" <danrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> What are you considering a piece of junk?
> XDan


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz