| Subject: | Re: [OM] Linear vs. Circular polarizer |
|---|---|
| From: | reganconley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:47:19 -0500 (GMT-05:00) |
Nevermind. Found the answer on the OM-FAQ:
"Due to the semi-silvered mirrors in the OM-{2S, 3(Ti), 4(Ti), and PC} you must
use a circular polarizer with them, otherwise your exposures will be off by 2-3
stops. The OM-{1(N), 2(N), 10, G, and F) do not have a semi-silvered mirror,
and can thus use linear polarizers without any problem."
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Linear vs. Circular polarizer, Piers Hemy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Linear vs. Circular polarizer, Piers Hemy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Linear vs. Circular polarizer, Piers Hemy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Linear vs. Circular polarizer, Piers Hemy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |