The Fuji 800 can be better if scanned properly, below is one with Fuji Super
G800, 100/2 at F2.8, T32 bounced off a 30-40 feet ceiling (taken in 1999):
http://www.accura.com.hk/G800_01.jpg
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Siddiq" <iddibhai@xxxxxxx>
> CH Ling, that wasn't a super good exposure to start with (fill ratio of
1:2
> flash to ambient) and no rock solid support etc. basically the scan was to
> demonstrate the lack of sharpening artifacts. you mention that it looked
> flat, well, NPZ was chosen specifically for super wide latitude (even if
it
> means compressed highs) :)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
