NOW the truth comes out. IMPACT!
----------------------------------------------------
John Hermanson www.zuiko.com
mail: omtech@xxxxxxxxx
Camtech, Olympus Sales & Service since 1977
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743-4714
631-424-2121
----------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Bent 50-250?
Thanks Clint. I might have a look at the mounts, lens and camera and
see if there is any deformation or play. Of course, since this is the
OM4 that I dropped onto cobblestones in Trier some years ago, I might
finally have found the damage it caused...
Chris
On Tuesday, Aug 5, 2003, at 19:56 Europe/London,
clintonr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> That's not unheard of. Most of the larger/longer/heavier OM lenses
> have a
> tripod mount, but not the zooms (except for the 85-250mm). The
> camera's
> tripod mount wasn't designed to support that much weight. Yes, using
> it to
> hold up a heavy lens can deform the casting causing all sorts of
> different
> problems.
>
> Chris Barker wrote:
>
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|