Tom,
Thanks. I won't hunger over the 100 2 any more in that I have a 90 2 and
100 2.8. I like the size of the 100 2.8.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Tom Scales
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 7:54 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] 100mm 2 vs. 2.8
I own the 100/2.8 and no longer own the 100/2. The 100/2 is too similar to
the 90/2 and both are big and heavy. The 100/2.8 is little and light -- much
more useful.
That said, I like the 85/2 better than either 100.
Tom
> In terms of actually using these lenses, what is the difference between
the
> 100/2 and the 100/2.8 (other than the extra f-stop and being heavier,
etc.)?
> If you had both, when would you use one over the other?
>
> RickM
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|