Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 21 versus 24

Subject: Re: [OM] 21 versus 24
From: OM4Ti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:24:24 -0400
I agree with Barry. I find that my 18 and 21 get far more usage than my 24
or 28.

When I go wide I really like the look that the super wides provide. In fact
I can not recall when my 28/2.8 was used last. The 24/2 was used maybe twice
that I can recall in the last 10-15 years. However the 18/3.5 and 21/2 have
both been used on 3-4 different occasions this year already.

My little lightweight bag has my really beat up champagne 4T in it with the
tiny 21/3.5, 35-70/3.5-4.5, 100/2.8 and a T-20.

Mark


----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry B. Bean" <bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] 21 versus 24


> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 08:50:32 -0700, William Sommerwerck wrote:
>
> >And as wide as 24mm is, 21 is an extreme wide angle you're less-likely to
use.
>
> In my own use, it works just the opposite - by the time I get out to the
20s, I want an extreme perspective, and the 21 gets the nod. In fact, my 24
collects dust
> while my 21 is part of my light kit (21, 50, 100).
>
>
> --
> Barry B. Bean
> Bean & Bean Cotton Company
> Peach Orchard, MO
> www.beancotton.com
> www.beanformissouri.org
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz