I suggested to my customer to send it back then immediately contest the
charges through his cc company.
----------------------------------------------------
John Hermanson www.zuiko.com
mail: omtech@xxxxxxxxx
Camtech, Olympus Sales & Service since 1977
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743-4714
631-424-2121
----------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "CyberSimian" <CyberSimian2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Mailing List" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 7:56 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: conservative graders [was: 50~250 Tokina]
> ------ Original message ------
> > Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:05:24 -0400
> > From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [OM] conservative graders [was: 50~250 Tokina]
>
> > I'm referring to B&H, though all transactions I've had with them have
> > been good.
>
> >> A customer of mine from the UK bought a "new in box 135mm f4.5 Zuiko"
> >> and got a heavily used lens, in a plastic bag, with no papers. Sounds
> >> like they may have taken advantage of the distance of delivery.
>
> Wow! I had virtually the same experience with B&H, but with a different
> Zuiko sold as new:
>
> o Lens damaged
> o Wrong box
> o No paperwork
> o Single coated (picture on web site showed multicoated)
>
> I wonder if B&H make a habit of this sort of behaviour for buyers not in
the
> US? (I sent the bad lens back and B&H replaced it with the correct item.)
>
> -- from Cy in the UK
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|