And the 2 or 2n for long night scenes...and the 3 for cold weather....
You really need one of each, with an extra one for backup....
tOM
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 at 9:57
Thomas Heide Clausen <OMCameras@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You definitely want an OM1 for astrophoto. All-mechanical, and
> substantially cheaper than the -4 :)
>
> As for the difference between the -1 and the -4, well, there are
> plenty: the -4 is all-electronic, with multi-spot metering, digital
> viewfinder, apeture-priority auto-exposure, TTL-flash, ....
>
> The -4 and -1 are alltogether different beasts, although both
> beautiful and nice cameras :)
>
>
> --thomas
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:30:18 -0000
> "scopemanfl" <westwind101@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I currently have an OM-10 which i am using for astrophotography,
> > but it is hard because I can not change out the mirror on the
> > OM-10. Only the OM 1 through 4's allow the mirror to be switched
> > out for a more specialized one. Which is the 'best' OM between 1
> > and 4, or are they all pretty much equal? Curious if they made any
> > big changes in those few years.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Kegan---- Abacurial Information Management Consultants ----
Tom A. Trottier, President http://abacurial.com
758 Albert St, Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
N45.412 W75.714 +1 613 860-6633 fax:+1-270-596-1042
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|