| Subject: | Re: [OM] 90/2 Zuiko vs. 90/2.8 Tamron |
|---|---|
| From: | "Garry D. Lewis" <erind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:20:43 -0700 (PDT) |
Walt announced-
>and if it gets dropped over a cliff or eaten by a bear, it will
>cost about a third as much to replace.
Is that with or without the camera that was attached? With or without
the cost of x-rays and veternarian surgery?
yours accounting the days,
Garry
=====
Elephant? What Elephant?
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 90/2 Zuiko vs. 90/2.8 Tamron, Walt Wayman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [OM] 90/2 Zuiko vs. 90/2.8 Tamron, Timpe, Jim |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 90/2 Zuiko vs. 90/2.8 Tamron, Walt Wayman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 90/2 Zuiko vs. 90/2.8 Tamron, Albert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |