Shld be the OM + 90/2 bcos of the reach and oportunities and the specialist
pics it produces.... The spot metering gives it added justification....
The Leica (+ 50/2 ) plus the 21/4 shld be the other arrangement
Rgds
TMLee
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "oly" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:47 PM
Subject: [OM] Hiking: 50/2 or 90/2?
> Last time I went hiking with the *other* camera, I really wished I have
the
> OM4T+ one of the macro lens for the occasionally macro shots. However,
> neither the 50/2 nor the 90/2 is small. The 50/2 wins here since it is
> smaller but the 90 has a different perspective than the lenses on the
other
> camera.
>
> So question is if you can only bring one lens w/ your OM (plus another
> camera with its lens), would you take the 50/2 or the 90/2?
>
> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com>
> <http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|