See, there was an important bit of extra information here: that you
were looking only at RF :)
I have only ever touched a Mamiya 7 a long time ago when it came out,
so I do not know a whole lot about MF-RFs. All I know about RFs in
general is from the 35RD -- i.e. not a whole lot :)
Actually, the Pentax 645 SLRs are not all that unhandy: looks a bit
like a really big Oly and less like a *blad. Never heard it nor
touched it, though...
Let's know what you decide upon finally :)
--thomas
On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 10:17:49 +0800
Albert <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am the "Uber minimalist" That's why I own an OM! That's why I
> want an MF RF! The Pentax 67, has a mirrorslap that sounds like a
> man beating his stepchild. It's so big, thieves don't think about
> stealing it because they wouldn't be able to run with it!
>
> For MF's, the advantages of SLR's is interchangable backs, and so
> digital is not a problem. But the RF's are MUCH better as far as
> street travel use IMHO.
>
> Aside from Mamiya and what was once Fuji, any other RF makers for
> the MF market or no?
>
> Albert
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://byzantium.inria.fr:8080/~voop
------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|