Hi,
I'd take a 40 mm and a 85/2 (or 100/2.8) and a OM 4 Ti.
Not considering weight, I'd take a 35/2 and a 100/2.
But it all depends on what you want to shoot and how fast you need the
lenses to be.
The 35-70/3.5-4.5 is a great little lens if you don't need a lot of speed,
and this could be combined with either a 24 mm or 135 mm lens.
I once brought only a 35/2 and a 100/2.8 with me to Greece - along with an
OM 2 S/P - as I forgot the 50 mm lens, which I didn't really miss. I could
have used a 24 mm lens, though.
Lars
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]Pa
vegne af petertje@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sendt: 17. maj 2003 21:59
Til: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Emne: [OM] Re: lightweight travel
Hi,
> Given _lightweight travel_ criteria, i.e. one body, 2 lenses, period.
> What would you take?
Just my problem at the moment. I'm nearly certain about taking the
50mm/f1.4 and the 90mm/f2.0. Probably my 28mm/f2.8 will join in as well.
If I would go on a buying spree, I could potentially swap the wide angle for
a 24mm (either), and the 90mm/f2.0 (I really couldn't, but hypothetically)
for a 85-250, but then it's not really lightweight anymore.
Add an OM-4Ti body. Total weight about a kilogram and a half.
Peter.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|