Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: > Subject: Re: [OM] 134/4.5 & 65-116

Subject: Re: > Subject: Re: [OM] 134/4.5 & 65-116
From: George Sears <gwsears@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 21:23:45 -0500
I did the same with one of their 135/4.5 
macros. They contacted me back, said there 
was some defect and asked if I still 
wanted it. I gave the answer they wanted 
me to give, No thanks.

GeoW

3/1/03 7:26:51 PM, NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:

>
>
>  Date:   Sat, 01 Mar 2003 19:26:51 -0500 
(EST)
>
>  From:   NSURIT@xxxxxxx
>  Subject:Re: > Subject: Re: [OM] 134/4.5 
& 65-116
>  To:     olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>  In a message dated 3/1/2003 3:56:01 PM 
Central Standard Time,
>  jeffreyrkeller@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>
>
>  A month or so ago Adorama had several 
135mm f4.5s for sale at about $160
>  and had another mismarked "80-135" tube 
for about $100
>
>
>
>  Yes, They accepted my order for the 80-
135 tube, I sold mine to someone else
>
>  and then the said that the "demo" tube 
was damaged and they couldn't send
>  it.  Oh well, such is life.  Another 
will come to live with me soon (I
>  hope).  Bill Barber




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz