Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Question: 65-116 + more extension

Subject: Re: [OM] Question: 65-116 + more extension
From: Skip Williams <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:02:22 -0500
The warning is likely due to Olympus' concern that the auto-diaphragm mechanism 
will have to work too hard to close all those linkages that you will introduce 
with tubes.

That said, I've used my Auto-Tube and 1, 2, or 3 extension tubes with great 
success.  Maybe I'm bad?

I say as long as you don't do it every day, it would be OK. The alternative is 
a bellows.


Skip

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Please reply to [skipwilliams at pobox.com]
Direct responses to the email address on the header may get lost
----------------------------------------------------------------->

>Subject: [OM] Question: 65-116 + more extension
>   From: Andrew Gullen <andrew.gullen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>   Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:09:06 -0500
>     To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>In the manual for my 65-116 tube, in the "care for use" list, it says not to
>add any other sort of extension. I was thinking of doing so to get closer to
>2X with the 80f4 (I haven't found the 170mm closeup lens yet).
>
>Does anyone know why this isn't a good idea?
>
>Andrew
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz