Maybe the list name change is no longer necessary?
Out of a sudden more ON topics.
As an extremely rare poster and also rare lurker (out of time
constraints - I am doing up my house and in doing so are my own
builder, plumber, electrician, joiner ...) I recently thought that I was
in the wrong list.
So thanks Chris for 'biting your tongue'!
Also thanks to Wayne, Joel W. and Winsor for your enlightenment
towards bokeh - it puts an end to all that 'self doubting'.
And, Norman, those pictures are great!
Sorry, there will be some more lurking.
---
Reinhold
/snip
>
> ... and is likely to polarise opinion to the detriment of
> good fellowship.
> ...
> but I have resisted the desire to express those views and I shall
> continue to bite my metaphorical tongue. Please let us get back
> to SUVs, EPA promises, eBoo traders whom we are not sure we
> trust and... and.. oh yes, Olympus cameras (even the ghastly
> digital things ;-))
>
> Chris
>
> C M I Barker
> Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
>
=========
>
> Don't feel bad, Wayne. I'll let you in on a secret. There is no
> such thing as bokeh. It's a kind of non-being. People who talk
> about it don't understand that you can't really talk about it. And
> it's not like the Tao that you can't talk about. Just take your
> 50/3.5, open up the lens, shoot into the sun, and be happy.
>
> Bokeh-schmokeh,
> Joel W.
>
=======
>
> Thanks for clearing that up. I suspected as much based on the
> fact that bokeh discussions give me the same feeling as New
> Ager's discussions of 'auras'. ;-)
>
> Winsor Crosby
> Long Beach, California, USA
>
/snip
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|