Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Tamron Adaptall 2 Lenses-God or Bad

Subject: Re: [OM] Tamron Adaptall 2 Lenses-God or Bad
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 15:33:55 -0800
Some of the SP series are outstanding lenses. The 80-200/2.8* is world class. The 35-105/2.8 and 60-300/3/8-5.4 are excellent. The 35-210/3.5-4.2 is also a good lens. Walt swears by his 28-105/2.8, but, like the 80-200, it's a big, heavy lens. The 28-70/3.5-4.5* is a decent, 2 touch, compact zoom, but not as good or as compact as the Zuiko 35-70/3.5-4.5*. The 70-210/3.5* has an almost unique lens hood that adjusts for focal length (like the Zuiko 35-70/3.6).

*Tested on Gary's lens test page <http://members.aol.com/olympusom/lenstests/default.htm>

Moose

John W. Sloane, DMD wrote:

Hi all,
I've been off list for a while, and I am wondering if the Tamrom Adaptall 2 
lenses are good performers.  specifically wondering about the 24mm and the
28-70, 28-105 and 70-210 zooms. just a genera opinion is all I am looking for.  
I like their zoom ranges better than the Zuikos (!!HERESY!!)




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz