Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: in defense of the shift lenses

Subject: [OM] Re: in defense of the shift lenses
From: Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 23:31:24 -0800
>From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>I betcha you'll be happier with a real macro lens and a geared
>head...

I have a geared head, the Bogen 410 (or Manfrotto 3275).

But they do fundamentally different things than shift lenses. A gear head does 
yaw, pitch, and roll on a point (well, close to a point), whereas a shift lets 
you "fly over" a surface.

If you're shooting flat work with minimal depth of field, the geared head will 
require refocusing with each movement; the shift will not.

That's not to say that to say that a shift lens is as good at those distances 
as a "real" macro lens, just that it's a neat thing to do. :-)

-- 
: Jan Steinman -- nature Transography(TM): <http://www.Bytesmiths.com>
: Bytesmiths -- artists' services: <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/Services>
: Buy My Step Van! <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/van>

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz