Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] T45?

Subject: Re: [OM] T45?
From: julian_davies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:45:13 +0000 (GMT)
Big, heavy and inconvenient for batteries. BUT very powerful, controllable, 
built - in bounce.
If you can find one for sensible money and the Ni-Cds are holding charge, go 
for it, but make sure you have something else for when you want your arms to 
stay at their normal length.
Mine stays at home almost permanently as I found T32 and BG2 to be a much more 
usable combination in the vast majority of circumstances, but that's an 
entirely personal call.

Julian

>  from:    "R. Jackson" <jackson.robert.r@xxxxxxxxx>
>  date:    Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:36:49
>  to:      olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  subject: Re: [OM] T45?
> 
> What are your general impressions of the T45 for use with an OM-4T? 
> Does anyone have any experience with one of these? It seems like a 
> fairly nice bounce unit.
> 
> BTW, my 283 just started blinking.
> 
> -Rob
> 
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz