Anybody notice the Mamiya advertisement for the 645AFD on the back of
Peterson's Jan 2003 issue? They list the negative size as "6 x 4.5 mm"
(MM!!) That's just barely larger than Super8. Now that's impressive! Imagine
getting medium format in such a small package. Is that what they mean by
'compression'?
-Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas" <cjss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Lista de correo Olympus" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Super8 vs VHS, NTSC, & PAL
> >>Here's a list of movie film formats:
> >>
> >>8mm: 4.9 x 3.55 mm
> >>Super-8: 5.36 x 4 mm
> >>16mm: 10.05 x 7.42 mm
> >>35mm: 16 x 22 mm
> >>70mm: 52.2 x 23 mm
> >
> >Thanks. Where did you get the information?
>
> "Optical Instrumentation -- Theory and Design" by B.N.Begunov,
> N.P.Zakaznov, S.I.Kiryushin and V.I.Kuzichev. MIR Publishers, Moscow 1988.
> ISBN 5-03- 000008-9
>
> ...
>
> Carlos J. Santisteban
>
> <cjss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <http://cjss.galeon.com>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|