Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Ree: [OM] 35-80 2.8 (was " I may have fanged and not known")

Subject: Ree: [OM] 35-80 2.8 (was " I may have fanged and not known")
From: Larry <halpert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:00:54 -0400
At this website under the heading Sinarcam 1, thepicture shows it with the 24
shift.

http://web.archive.org/web/20010827154859/http://www.sinar.ch/sinar/digital/digi_e/kam1.html

Larry

Rick wrote:

> >Didn't they also use the 24 Shift?
>
> >Larry
> ------------
> Larry,
> If they did, I never saw one, and I was exposed to many of these systems, as
> I worked for Leaf systems and Scitex (makers of the Leaf digital backs that
> went on the Sinarcams).
>
> Sinar didn't have much reason to use a shift lens since the Sinarcam fit
> nicely on their Sinar P-2 view camera which offers swings and tilts way
> beyond the capabilities of ANY shift lens. And of course they would MUCH
> rather sell you a view camera than a shift lens.
>
> Rick.
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz