Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM bodies vs. Contax Aria (was: OM-4Ti)

Subject: Re: [OM] OM bodies vs. Contax Aria (was: OM-4Ti)
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 16:48:42 -0700



Well, the key to success on meteor-showers photography is a great number of
cameras with very fast film (at least ASA 1600) and lenses (like 50/1.4),
in order to cover nearly all the sky -- nine cameras with nothing longer
than a 50mm (nor shorter than 35mm) is an usual setup. Wide-angles aren't
good for this because they have too much light fall-off at corners and/or
they're very slow -- pity there isn't an f/1.4 fisheye over there!

My astrophotographic interests make me use quite unusual films, wich won't
allow me to use that body for other tasks, so having
more-than-a-reasonable-amount of bodies is a nice thing for me, anyway ;-)

...

Carlos Santisteban

I appreciate the comments on the Aria and its lenses. I guess my joke about 360 degree panoramas was accidentally close to the truth.
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz