Olympus-OM

RE: [OM] 28-28/4, was 35-80, was originally 85/2 subject matter

from John Cwiklinski

Subject:	RE: [OM] 28-28/4, was 35-80, was originally 85/2 subject matter
From:	"John Cwiklinski" <plinkochips@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 02 Aug 2002 17:30:27 -0700

Skip wrote:

The 28-48/4 is pretty nice.
<snip>
Oh, I also have the hard-to-find hood. :-))
<<

Well, so do I. So there. :o)

John Cwiklinski

_________________________________________________________________

MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] 28-28/4, was 35-80, was originally 85/2 subject matter, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx RE: [OM] 28-28/4, was 35-80, was originally 85/2 subject matter, T . Clausen RE: [OM] 28-28/4, was 35-80, was originally 85/2 subject matter, T . Clausen RE: [OM] 28-28/4, was 35-80, was originally 85/2 subject matter, John Cwiklinski <=

Previous by Date:	[OM] Tamron SP zoom, Bill Stanke
Next by Date:	RE: [OM] Back Home to Flash Trouble, Henry Bottjer-BA
Previous by Thread:	RE: [OM] 28-28/4, was 35-80, was originally 85/2 subject matter, T . Clausen
Next by Thread:	[OM] Tamron SP zoom, Bill Stanke
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]