| Subject: | Re: [OM] Re: NO prism foam |
|---|---|
| From: | "Alan" <atk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 22 May 2002 15:58:51 -0000 |
Er -- I'm so confused. If foam is bad -- why did the early camera not have it but the newer ones do ? Alan < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] FS - Major pre-Memorial Day/ebay sale. Great stuff (Very Long), AG Schnozz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] wtb or trade: vivitar series 1 90mm or tamron 90mm macro, Eric Goodell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: NO prism foam, John Hermanson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: NO prism foam, dreammoose |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |